Another Double Standard.

Short and sweet..

I always see these guys on my Timeline via Twitter, talking about gold diggers and women only being interested in them for their money, or so called "social status". 

Mind you, these are the same gentlemen that will have every piece of jewelry that they own on in their profile picture. Or, they're constantly twit pic-ing whatever car they're leasing this quarter, club pics of them spilling Moet Rose, and the reaaaally popular picture of them standing with or around celebrities. So, I ask, what and who are you trying to attract if you're only selling the materialistic side of your social existence? Rhetorical. You're not writing poetry, saving animals from oil spills or recycling all your empty Moet bottles, YOU ARE SHOWING OFF in an attempt to get ATTENTION. You successfully get attention from women, and say.."All you bitches want is my money" ..WELP, stop broadcasting what you do not want to be used for. 

It's kind of like "Million Dollar Matchmaker". Seriously. They want to tell these women "No sex until monogamy"..and "No gold digging" but yet, the very allure of your service is in the first two words of your business name .."Million Dollar". Then the men have the audacity to feel a "way" that women only want them for their money, so they sign up for a dating service that describes their current tax bracket, and what? You expect to attract who? Knock it off. 

My point is this: Men, don't be mad when a woman desires or would like to date a partner who is financially stable and/or wants to be taken care of. ESPECIALLY if you're very forthright with your financial social status. After all, men clearly are permitted to date women based on their physical attributes, and that seems to be ok. But the moment a woman would like to date a man on his financial attributes, she is a gold digger. Aren't both equally superficial, yet one more chastised than the other?

Why do we have a problem with women who are attracted to men with money, but do not have a problem with men who draw class distinctions with women based on their beauty, or lack there of..?