Loyalty VS Faithful
2.19.2010
This is the question I asked everyone, weeks ago, on my blog. The results are above. And I have to say I do agree with the majority.
Even though the words "faithful" and "loyal" are used in both of the definitions for the two, I think that there may be a difference when demonstrating them in a "romantic" relationship. I will go as far as to say that the two are synonyms. Similar, and nearly the same. But in my opinion, its how the words are demonstrated through actions that truly define their separation.
In a monogamous relationship we desire the faithful. A man who is faithful will see you and only you. If he is faithful, he will not have a girlfriend #2, which has become our new normality, present day. A faithful man won't stray, won't leave, won't fall to temptation, he is a one woman man. This, to me, is what I would define as faithful.
Now, I'm going to define what so many current day relationships have become. A man who has secret relationships, who is always checking out the other woman, or checking for the other woman, sleeping with other women, flirting with another woman or even developing extramarital affairs with other women, BUT, always comes back to their girlfriend number one, or their wife. They can and will cheat, lie, and have their secrets, but will continue to come home to that one woman, no matter what.
As much as we don't want to call this loyal, this may be a small version of it. Loyalty is usually understood, once it is tested. It usually takes someone being tempted to know if they're even devoted. But some actually believe that even if they fall to temptation, as long as they come back, they're demonstration some kind of bond, when someone who is faithful, would have never left in the first place.
This would include such guys as Reggie Bush, Josh Duhamel, P-Diddy, Kobe Bryant, as being loyal. These are all men who have relationships with a said "girlfriend", but who have also had promiscuous ways, and seem to always find their way back home. Which I guess could be debatable, since our sources are celeb blogs. Either way, they're loyal to who they come home to. But, not at all faithful. Is it making sense yet?
This is just a theory of mine. Not at all factual..but I think it explains a lot of relationships that are open without the other person in the relationship even knowing. Womp.
Loyalty versus being Faithful, thoughts?













21 thought(s)..:
I agree 100% with this Brook!
This is COMPLETELY true! Today's society is really twisted and alot of the genuine-ness that was once present in alot of "romantic" relationships have come to a halt, with partners being "loyal" and not "faithful"...its a DAMN shame and, but hey who knows how to end this horrible trend?!...aside from this, i wanna say ur an incredible writer and ur always hella insightful! PLEASE keep it up and i absolutely CANNOT wait to read ur book!
Now that you've broken it down like this, I see a difference. I never really thought of them being two completely different terms, but in reality i guess relationships show more loyalty than faithfulness.
Nicely put, Brook. I just listened to your interview with Starr Nicole this week...I know Im late.. You are strangely fascinating *smiles*..People really are drawn to you girl!! Looking forward to your book! Keep up the great work...very inspiring!
Love this blog - I found it through one of those celeb blog sites. Hmmm- what if women were loyal, yet unfaithful? Is that acceptable yet? Because, seriously, how many times have I resisted temptation.
I believe on the one hand to each their own, but on the other, where does personal responsibility and accountability come in... oh yeah, that's no fun, and fun is what this society is based on.
Wow, Brook! This is very true and I never thought about it that way.
♥Cc
There is definitely a huge difference btwn the two that goes far beyond infidelity sexually
Like you've said before, loyalty is vintage and I believe being faithful is just nonexistent. Atleast in my city (DC) it is lol.
By the way, I know you adore Jay Z, as do I, I found this clip of him mean muggin the mascot at the Allstar game LOL. This brought me life!! LMAO
http://i49.tinypic.com/219tq43.jpg
Success is knocking at your door honey, keep up the hard work! Kudos Brook!!
- twitter.com/Lavish_lady
Love the post. I absolutely agree that there's a distinct difference between the two. Bill Clinton is a LOYAL husband to Hilary, but no means faithful. He has gone through the fire with Hil and there is NO OTHER woman (besides Chelsea) that he'd do that for...and there are men that are faithful, but who aren't loyal, those are men who have EMOTIONAL connections/commitment with a woman, but not a physical connection. The South Carolina governor had that with his mistress BEFORE he slept with her. He was emotionally committed before he went M.I.A. to south america...
So is being faithful better than being loyal? I dunno...
I think they should go hand in hand. I don't care two bits about a person's loyalty if they're not being faithful to me. But that's just me :-)
great blog!!..thanks for sharing your wisdom..because i too, couldn't differentiate loyal and being faithful!.
can't wait to have this all in one book...all three copies!!!..definitely going to give one to my little sister!
I totally agree with your theory on faithful vs loyalty. If I had to chose, I would prefer a man to be loyal than faithful. Faithfulness doesn't make a person break their back for you. On the other hand, a strong sense of loyalty will...
HOT TOPIC, loyalty is a stronger substance. However with relationships the more I leran about men the more I see it's not that big of a diffrence between men & women. I've been trying to figure out why ppl cheat married or not. I've come to the conclusion that I struggle with being both conservative and liberal on this matter. It's in our nature to desire more. Like money, homes, diamonds, etc. I don't want to go to far but, take a lion and 1000's of other species. Once the male lions is finished with the lioness he moves on to the next one. But like a man as long as he's with her another male lion can't come no where her, or he will die, true stories. I'm not saying were animals. Some male/females animal's will put up a fight if one moves on to the next one but it's rare. Unlike humans we want to kill someone about our man/ woman. Now research has shown male wolves mate with one partner until his/her death & maybe he/she will move on to the next one, but it's unlikely. That's why it's called a wolf pack. I can go on... I love men, so give me loyalty anyday if you stray keep it away from me. Just my opinion.. will be getting your book..
being faithful is more important than being loyal. loyalty can be blinding, faith is true trust.
It's sad that women are beginning to think "loyalty" is "faithful". We want relationships to strive so much that we make ourselves believe these things, and for what? So we can believe that what we have is real? It's baffling at how much times have changed from where loyalty was loyalty, and faithful was being faithful. With the way society is right now, I wonder is it even possible to have a true meaning of each . . .
I think your perspective is an interesting one. Is it possible, though, that being faithful is in practice what being loyal is in theory? I definitely believe they're different, but I also think a man or woman can express their loyalty for one another by being faithful. Maybe I'm a "have it all" kind of girl, but I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. And why shouldn't we require both in our relationships if both are required of us? Not to delve all into the whole "double standard" argument. I'm just saying people only treat you the way you let them. Could be time to start teaching one another what's acceptable and what absolutely is not. Getting off my soapbox now. LOL.
i agree that there is a difference between loyal and faithful.
just wanted to say happy belated miss brook eff baby!!
i deleted my twitter so i hope u get this! =]
cant wait for the book still!!!<333
Sad, but true!
[URL=http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/details.php?image_id=14627][IMG]http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/data/thumbnails/22/Shriya Saran-145.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/details.php?image_id=14628][IMG]http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/data/thumbnails/22/Shriya Saran-146.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/details.php?image_id=14630][IMG]http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/data/thumbnails/22/Shriya Saran-148.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[url=http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/cat-Shriya-Saran-22.htm]Shriya Saran Wallpapers[/url]
Photo gallery at WallpaperHungama.in is dedicated to Shriya Saran Pictures. Click on the thumbnails for enlarged Shriya Saran pictures, personal photographs and exclusive photos. Also check out other Pictures Gallery for High quality and High Resolution image scans, movie captures, movie promos, wallpapers, hollywood & bollywood pictures, photos of actresses and celebrities.
HMMMMMMMM ...
its been a long time blogger buuuuuuuuuddy!!!!
Anyway, i see your point, and it is a good one. However, i personally think those two are VERY different.
Faithful is a close sibling to Loyal, agreed! However, loyal is a close sibling to familiarity, and familiarity is a identical twin to comfortability.
I can say by your definition Loyal is the same as comfortability.
So my take is they are not being loyal(as per per the way it is defined and used), but instead they are being comfortable. When you are comfortable that is why you go home. So the loyalty to the relationship or person you speak of is not that at all, but instead loyalty to only one person and its the person who decides that he or she is the only person they have loyalty to.
So YES, there is a difference, but a much bigger difference, and a totally different one than you portrayed. :) :) :)
Post a Comment